| Author | Post |
|---|
Wunderknabe
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 22nd, 2006 |
| Location: | ^^^iFraud |
| Posts: | 10266 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20th, 2006 11:07 am |
|
Thanks, I hadn't seen that one. I love how he ends his big speech with "let us not demagogue it."![[grin]](/forums/themes/default/grinning-smiley-007.gif)
|
Reta_Democrat
Member
| Joined: | Sun Mar 26th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1498 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21st, 2006 04:32 am |
|
LOL! Did you read the whole thread yet? You should have read some of the insane, not to mention rubbished and nonsensed (and frankly hippocritical), statements that he directed towards individual members and the members in the thread in general. 
For example, he told me I should "show some humility," that it will do me good. First of all, his english there is grammatically incorrect. So much for wanting me to learn Enlgish (read the rest of the post). Second of all, showing humility is something he did not do throughout his own thread. Then he said that my problem is that my writing stinks, and my logic "knows no language." I'm pretty sure you can figure how this statement is a bit flawed.
The bottom line is, he was hippocritical throughout at that post which he directed towrads me. I didn't even bother giving back a reply because I didn't think it would be constructive to say, "so are you and your ideas." I seriously thought it would be a huge waste of my time. haha. Also, read about his statements to CTHLUHLU (chu-chu) about his own use of the English language. I seriously couldn't stop laughing at this!! 
![[usa]](/forums/themes/default/usa.gif)
|
Wunderknabe
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 22nd, 2006 |
| Location: | ^^^iFraud |
| Posts: | 10266 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21st, 2006 05:59 am |
|
| I just went back and read it all. I started writing everything stupid from him down to duplicate it here, but there was just too much . No point in giving him more screen space, anyway.
|
Tremo
Member
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21st, 2006 06:57 am |
|
LOL. PV is a real piece of work.
Attachment: Bush_stupidityverysm.jpg (Downloaded 338 times)
|
Reta_Democrat
Member
| Joined: | Sun Mar 26th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1498 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21st, 2006 07:06 am |
|
Tremo wrote: 
ROFWLMBOUUE!!!! ![[blink]](/forums/themes/default/scared.gif)
|
Tremo
Member
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21st, 2006 07:13 am |
|
Oh yeah?
Attachment: dumbfuckmtn.jpg (Downloaded 338 times)
|
Reta_Democrat
Member
| Joined: | Sun Mar 26th, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1498 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21st, 2006 08:02 am |
|
Tremo wrote:
AHAWW!! WTFlurell?? ![[bounce]](/forums/themes/default/1syellow1.gif)
Sorry, this is just giving me a laugh attack right now. Is there anything that you post that can't make me laugh? ![[eyeroll]](/forums/themes/default/sarcasm.gif)
|
Tremo
Member
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21st, 2006 11:01 am |
|
Indeed!
Attachment: rove05med.jpg (Downloaded 281 times)
|
f0ca1
Member
| Joined: | Mon Sep 18th, 2006 |
| Location: | USA |
| Posts: | 27924 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 23rd, 2006 06:34 am |
|
thetyrannyofevilmen wrote: f0ca1 wrote: thetyrannyofevilmen wrote: f0ca1 wrote: Eyes wrote: JDLoyola wrote: Lens wrote: JDLoyola wrote: I like that South Park cartoon where Chris Reeve is sucking down the blood of a fetus.
Well. You would.
Because it demonstrates how bloodthirsty liberals are who want to kill fetuses to save the lives of adults.
Get over your mommy issues.
http://www.wcbs880.com/pages/39886.php?contentType=4&contentId=147863
united, huh?
The fetuses used would die anyway, but you dont hear fundies challenging fertility treatment plants that just throw them in the biohazard buckets...
You know what you do hear them protesting about? How about GWB making it as well funded and easy to do stem cell research in this country as any other on the planet and still getting bitched at about not using the technology? How about us giving you the inch and you coming back for the mile? How about failing to exhaust current research capabilities while demanding new ones?
How about you leave the science to the scientists?
Because they rarely think before they act.
|
Cubster
Member
| Joined: | Tue Oct 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 19144 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 23rd, 2006 07:58 am |
|
Chesty_Puller wrote: Bush should be impeached for making liberals think about impeaching Bush all day long.
|
Cubster
Member
| Joined: | Tue Oct 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 19144 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 23rd, 2006 07:59 am |
|
Nailing Malarkey wrote: Seems Edwina Lee dose not know the difference between a joke and some undisclosed democrat operative anonymously accusing people of serious offenses based on undisclosed emails from unidentified accusers.
Typical democrats confusing a joke with calling someone a rapist without evidence.
If you are going to accuse me of depravity, learn to spell it so you won't reinforce the stereotype of the ignorant Democrat.
|
Proud2bLiberal
Member
|
Posted: Mon Oct 23rd, 2006 09:27 pm |
|
Hummer_Yum wrote:
Schmitt. wrote: Hummer_Yum wrote: What, pray tell, is it a part of if not evolution?
Mainstream cosmology (ie., the big bang) and abiogenesis. Evolution describes how life changes and diversifies through successive generations, not the entire history of the universe.
Actually we did not come from the Cro Magnon.
Yeah we did, they're so similar as to technically be the same species (Homo Sapiens), although really the graduation is so smooth that the species concept rather breaks down; and there are differences (more robust musculoskeletal structure and slightly larger brains) however minor.
If so, then why are we still searching for the "missing link"?
The missing link between what? 
Mainstream cosmology (ie., the big bang) and abiogenesis. Evolution describes how life changes and diversifies through successive generations, not the entire history of the universe.
Actually scientists are "iffy" about the big bang theory. Some do believe this and most are considering other theories. And on the contrary, evolution does describe the history of the universe. Ie, materials form into stars, stars form into super novas, super novas form into dwarf stars, and so on. And I can go on.
Furthermore, Darwinism is based on a theory that nothing was created, but that everything changes from one form to another. And that something cannot come from nothing. Thus, according to darwinists, the big bang could not have happened because the material to make it would have come from no where. And something from a second party had to create the cataclysmic "bang".
As with life. Life, according to Darwinism, must have evolved into another form of life. That it cannot be created from nothing. Enter creationism.
Yeah we did, they're so similar as to technically be the same species (Homo Sapiens), although really the graduation is so smooth that the species concept rather breaks down; and there are differences (more robust musculoskeletal structure and slightly larger brains) however minor.
Three reasons why humans didn't come from the Cro Magnum.
1. Some scientists believe Cro Magnun and Neandethalls interbred to create Homosapiens. But scientists noted that both species were so far apart that they could not breed.
2. Other scientists state that Homosapiens out rescourced the Cro Magnun, thus causing extinction. We could not have come from them in this case.
3. There is a common ancestor between the Cro Magnun and Homospiens that has not yet been found, despite world effort to uncover the early man and the prehistoric world.
The missing link between what?
Between Cro Magnun and Homosapien.
Here is a discussion between someone who has no idea what evolution is and someone who tries so hard to tell him that he has no idea what he is talking about (I am going back to finish reading the thread, I hope they continue the discussion).
|
Wunderknabe
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 22nd, 2006 |
| Location: | ^^^iFraud |
| Posts: | 10266 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24th, 2006 04:45 am |
|
Cubster wrote:
Nailing Malarkey wrote: Seems Edwina Lee dose not know the difference between a joke and some undisclosed democrat operative anonymously accusing people of serious offenses based on undisclosed emails from unidentified accusers.
Typical democrats confusing a joke with calling someone a rapist without evidence.
If you are going to accuse me of depravity, learn to spell it so you won't reinforce the stereotype of the ignorant Democrat.
Proud2bLiberal wrote:
Here is a discussion between someone who has no idea what evolution is and someone who tries so hard to tell him that he has no idea what he is talking about (I am going back to finish reading the thread, I hope they continue the discussion).
It's sad, but quotidian. I wish there wasn't so much misinformation out there.Last edited on Tue Oct 24th, 2006 04:47 am by Wunderknabe
|
Cubster
Member
| Joined: | Tue Oct 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 19144 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24th, 2006 05:00 am |
|
| Misinformation is usually propaganda. It's pathetic that more people aren't smart enough to see through it.
|
Proud2bLiberal
Member
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24th, 2006 05:52 pm |
|
Proud2bLiberal wrote:
Here is a discussion between someone who has no idea what evolution is and someone who tries so hard to tell him that he has no idea what he is talking about (I am going back to finish reading the thread, I hope they continue the discussion).
It's sad, but quotidian. I wish there wasn't so much misinformation out there.
It got better!!!
brontosaurus wrote:
Zelbach wrote: I reject the theory simply because of how mathematically absurd it is. First, a big boom supposedly formed a universe with planets that revolve around the sun. Then, single-cell organisms supposedly arrived from non-living material and eventually “evolved” into the complex life forms we see today -- that happen to rely on each other in vast webs. Anyone with a vague idea of probability should immediately laugh at such an absurd notion.
What he said.
In fact, the absurdity is so incredible - logic begs one to ask how a whole society of "intelligent" people could get so deep into something so illogical. The answer points to the fact that they must be under incredibly strong delusion. And what kind of delusion could cause the majority of clever-thinking people to throw off logic and keep delving into something so childish and rediculous? You might call this a stretch, but I think it is strong evidence for forces more powerful than the physical. In other words, how could so many of the best minds of our time look at sheer folly and embrace it, unless there are actually stronger forces drawing them.
I may sound like the biggest nut here, but I think the theory of evolution being believed is very strong evidence that there are actually sinister forces spiritually.
It's the same with the liberal's love-affair with death and terrorists and always taking the side of the criminal over the victim.
Here is the link for anyone who wants to read the whole thing, it is pretty entertaining. http://www.perspectives.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=121419&forum_id=5&page=2 ![[surprise]](/forums/themes/default/party-smiley-042.gif)
|
supermanrulez13
Member
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24th, 2006 06:22 pm |
|
ANI wrote:
I don't know how many Libs are atheists...but, you can bet that all atheists are Liberals.
|
Wunderknabe
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 22nd, 2006 |
| Location: | ^^^iFraud |
| Posts: | 10266 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 24th, 2006 09:19 pm |
|
| Isn't Schmitt and atheist conservative?
|
Cubster
Member
| Joined: | Tue Oct 11th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 19144 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26th, 2006 11:35 pm |
|
B wrote:
jessemichaels wrote: B wrote: jessemichaels wrote: And equal rights is just common sense, you dont need proof. one group can do the samethings as another group of people. There you go.
Do I get to walk into women's restrooms? Do I get to fly like birds? Do I get to drive mercedes?
There's a fine line between "equal rights" and socialist oppression. Taking away the religious right of marriage isn't equal rights.
People can still get married through the churchor any other religion, no one is stopping you there.
You cant fly like a bird because you dont have the means to . my key word was people for this one.
And you can drive mercedes, if you have the economic means.
Gay people can still get married through a church or any religion.
Gay people can get married in the true definition of the word, to the opposite sex. No one is outlawing that. To let them get married to the same sex is a special right that oppresses the people by taking control of religion, setting up a government religion, taking away their religious rights.
Gay marriage can be legislated if the people vote for it. To make this new law through judicial means is undemocratic, unconstitutional, and creates a liberal theocracy.
That's it, folks, if you defend equal rights, you're trying to create a liberal theocracy!
The whole thread is a riot. Don't miss it.
|
Wunderknabe
Member
| Joined: | Thu Jun 22nd, 2006 |
| Location: | ^^^iFraud |
| Posts: | 10266 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27th, 2006 12:01 am |
|
| He's been reading too much Coulter.
|
eddie
Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27th, 2006 12:45 am |
|
| If you think about it, a "liberal theocracy" doesn't sound so bad.
|
Current time is 06:12 am | Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...   |
|
