 |
| Author | Post |
|---|
alec bachlow
Member
| Joined: | Thu Mar 24th, 2005 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 136 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 7th, 2005 12:01 am |
|
| Balance- is there such a thing in political affairs? Left verses Right. Is the concept still a worthwhile persuit? Do we have a one party system in reality? Is it good or not if that is the case? If a bird has but one left wing flapping will the bird turn to the right? If the bird has one right wing flapping will it turn to the left...Or is an autocratic one party system the answer...Hard and straight driving right down the middle hitting the issues with firm impact causing change. Does this idea sound pornogrphic. Do we need to re-fertilize the nation with a real man and true womanhood? Getting some proper intellectual growth happening..Politics is theatre and sport...They are but actors on the stage, each playing their part with the same out come..as scripted. So to put it in "laypersons" terms (layman) -can I use the word man?...can I use the word wombman? Or is someone going to get bent out of shape in regards to the rule of natural law? Benevolent Dictatorship???...Is there one kind King in the land? So far as I can see there is an over abundance of second rate henchpersons....Why does the word Dictatorship dictate that it is bad in itself? Do we want a foriegn dictator? Or in the alternative - do we want our own...Ying and Yang bring the world to a standstill...Do we need some forward motion? Do we already have a King Is he George the First....Is that so bad! Other nations have always become jealous through out history if the other Nation has a KING and they do not...The middle is powerful but it must have supported forward thrust..the old fashioned kind...any comments on the concept? ***
|
Current time is 10:42 am | |
|
|
|
|
